Taito

Taito v. Owens Corning

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 796·7 Cal. App. 4th 798·9 Cal. Rptr. 2d 687·92 Daily Journal DAR 8555·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5502
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 22, 1992B059618California1,542 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

Plaintiff/employee filed a complaint against a third party for injuries sustained while in the course and scope of his employment. The workers’ compensation carrier for plaintiff’s employer later filed a complaint in intervention in plaintiff’s third party action. Plaintiff was subsequently permitted to file a complaint in intervention in his own third party action, but the court later struck plaintiff’s complaint in intervention. Plaintiff appeals from the order striking his complaint in intervention in his own third party action. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Synopsis

On July 10, 1989, appellant filed a complaint for personal injuries against Owens Coming, John Doe and Does I to X. Appellant alleged that he was physically attacked and beaten by John Doe on January 28, 1989, on premises owned by Owens Coming. At the time of the incident, appellant was acting within the course and scope of his employment as a security guard for Wells Fargo Guard, and John Doe was acting within the course and scope of his employment as a truck driver for Owens Coming.

On May 29, 1990, the complaint was served on respondent Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. (Apex), named as Doe I. Apex…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.