Lawler

Lawler v. City of Redding

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 812·7 Cal. App. 4th 778·9 Cal. Rptr. 2d 392·92 Daily Journal DAR 8752·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5622
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 8, 1992C010806California2,228 words

Opinion

Opinion

Scotland, J.

Defendant City of Redding (Redding) authorized construction of the Riverland Recreation Area, a sports complex containing six softball diamonds and two soccer fields on city-owned land in unincorporated Shasta County. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Redding approved a final environmental impact report (EIR) for the project and adopted a statement of overriding considerations and findings. Redding found that seven alternative sites for the project and two alternative uses of the chosen site were unacceptable. Redding also found: the project would not be growth-inducing because it “will not involve extension or improvement of off-site infrastructure systems” or require new streets or roadway extensions, and because the proposed roadway modifications are needed to relieve already existing congestion; the traffic improvements and mitigations recommended in the EIR adequately address the project’s traffic impacts, and pedestrian safety will be adequately addressed by the development of a paved pedestrian path; project-generated noise will be sufficiently mitigated by adopting a 50-foot setback from adjacent property lines, restricting public…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.