Graham

Graham v. Kirkwood Meadows Public Utilities District

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 51·21 Cal. App. 4th 1631·26 Cal. Rptr. 2d 793·94 Daily Journal DAR 890·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 558
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 1994C015319California4,976 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Appellant Kirkwood Meadows Public Utilities District (the District) appeals from the trial court’s issuance of a writ of administrative mandamus commanding the District to reinstate William K. Graham as an employee of the District. The District contends the trial court erred in concluding the District’s employee residency requirement was unlawful. We shall reverse.

Factual and Procedural Background

The District provides water, sewer, and other public services to the community of Kirkwood, California. The District must respond quickly in the event of water leaks, leaks in wastewater collection, raw sewage spills, power failures, and illegal discharges in wastewater collection. The District also assists with firefighting by ensuring that water storage and pressure is maintained and recharged.

In September 1987, the District’s board of directors enacted Policy Statement No. 445 (Policy 445), which provides that certain employment positions, including water/wastewater operators, “are required to reside within three (3) driving miles of the wastewater treatment plant complex.” Policy 445 expresses the reason for the policy as follows: “The District is located in a remote…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.