Whaley

People v. Whaley

Good Law
160 Cal. App. 4th 779·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 304·73 Cal. Rptr. 3d 133
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 2008H031647California10,101 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bamattre-Manoukian, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant George Whaley appeals from an order retroactively committing him to an “indeterminate term of commitment” (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6604.1, subd. (a)) as a sexually violent predator under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA) (§ 6600 et seq.). Whaley was first committed to a two-year term on January 28, 1999, and his commitment was extended for additional two-year terms thereafter. In 2007, while a petition to extend Whaley’s most recent term of commitment was pending, the People brought a motion to retroactively convert his first commitment on January 28, 1999, from a two-year term of commitment to an indeterminate term, pursuant to amended section 6604.1, subdivision (a), which provides that an indeterminate term begins on the date the court issues the “initial” order of commitment. The trial court agreed with the People’s interpretation of section 6604.1, subdivision (a), and ordered Whaley committed to an indeterminate term. The trial court imposed the indeterminate term retroactive to the first order committing Whaley in 1999, and without a trial on the pending petition to extend Whaley’s most recent term of commitment.

Whaley contends…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.