Adajar

Adajar v. RWR Homes, Inc.

Good Law
160 Cal. App. 4th 563·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 307·73 Cal. Rptr. 3d 17
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 2008D049936California3,089 words

Opinion

Opinion

McCONNELL, J.

In this construction defect case, defendants RWR Homes, Inc., and related entities (collectively RWR) appeal an order denying their motion to compel arbitration and stay the litigation as to certain plaintiffs. RWR contends the order violates federal and state laws that favor arbitration. RWR, however, did not submit the arbitration agreement that was allegedly incorporated by reference in plaintiffs’ applications for warranty protection. Because RWR did not satisfy its burden of establishing the existence of an arbitration contract, we affirm the order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

RWR built the single-family tract homes at issue in this action. In March 2006 the owners of 83 of the homes sued RWR for strict products liability, breach of implied and express warranties, breach of contract and negligence. The first amended complaint filed in May 2006 added the owners of an additional nine homes as plaintiffs. The amended pleading alleges various defects pertaining to soil compaction and movement; drainage, landscaping and irrigation; fencing and retaining walls; waterproofing; roofs; windows and doors; framing, drywall, siding and stucco; plumbing and electrical;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.