Ticconi

Ticconi v. Blue Shield of California Life & Health Insurance

Good Law
160 Cal. App. 4th 528·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 285·72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 888
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2008B190427California7,257 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

INTRODUCTION

The question before us is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion to certify a class under Proposition 64. Plaintiff Augusto Ticconi sued his health insurance provider defendant Blue Shield of California Life & Health Insurance Company (Blue Shield Life) under the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq. (the UCL)). Plaintiff alleged that Blue Shield Life violated Insurance Code sections 10113 and 10381.5 by failing to attach his application to or endorse it on the insurance policy when issued, and later rescinding the policy on the ground he had made misrepresentations in that application. Plaintiff also alleged that Blue Shield Life engaged in postclaims underwriting prohibited by section 10384. The trial court denied plaintiff’s motion for certification of a class of similarly situated insureds on the ground that Blue Shield Life’s defenses of fraud and unclean hands raised individual issues that predominated over the common issues related to liability. Plaintiff appeals.

We conclude that the trial court erred as a matter of law in ruling on the motion for class certification. The equitable defense of unclean…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.