Atlas

People v. Atlas

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 497·64 Cal. App. 4th 523·75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 307·98 Daily Journal DAR 5854·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4262
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 3, 1998B113059California3,233 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nott, J.

Donnell Atlas appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction by jury of possessing cocaine base for sale, with the finding that the offense was committed within 1,000 feet of a school. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11351.5, 11353.6, subd. (b).) The court found that he had sustained two prior serious felony convictions within the meaning of the “Three Strikes” law (Pen. Code, §§ 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d), 667, subds. (b)-(i)) and a prior conviction within the meaning of Health and Safety Code section 11370.2, subdivision (a). Appellant contends that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to instruct the jury that the intent to sell narcotics had to occur within 1,000 feet of a school in order for section 11353.6 to apply. We reject this claim, and hold that section 11353.6 does not require proof of such intent.

Facts and Procedural Background

The evidence established that at approximately 8:40 a.m. on May 7, 1996, two Los Angeles sheriff’s deputies driving eastbound on Manchester Boulevard stopped their marked patrol vehicle at a traffic light at Vermont Avenue and saw appellant standing in a nearby north/south alley. Along the alley, within 1,000 feet of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.