Frangipani

Frangipani v. Boecker

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 518·64 Cal. App. 4th 860·75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 407·98 Daily Journal DAR 6096·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4475
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 10, 1998E020067California1,968 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gaut, J.

1. Basis for Appeal

The buyer of real property purchased the property subject to an existing purchase money deed of trust. When the purchaser defaulted on the deed of trust payments, the sellers gave the original beneficiary a $10,000 promissory note to cancel the foreclosure in order to protect their own credit. The trial court granted the sellers a judgment against the defaulting purchaser for the amount of the promissory note.

We reverse the judgment because we conclude that the sellers’ execution of the promissory note was voluntary and that a judgment reimbursing the sellers for that promissory note would violate antideficiency legislation.

2. Facts

Chester J. Frangipani and Gertrude I. Frangipani (Frangipanis) owned three parcels of real property, one of which is involved in this appeal. Two trust deeds encumbered the subject property. One of those trust deeds was a junior purchase money trust deed executed by Frangipanis in favor of Frances J. Latimer (Latimer). Theodore J. Boecker (Boecker) wanted to purchase two of the parcels, but not the parcel encumbered by the Latimer trust deed. Frangipanis refused to sell any of the three parcels separately. In order to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.