Glasser

Plaintiff and appellant Stephen R. Glasser (Stephen), appeals from the judgment entered in favor of defendant and respondent Edward Glasser (Edward), upon Edward’s motion for summary adjudication of issues. Stephen contends ..that the trial court’s conclusion that he had no possessory interest in funds allegedly converted was incorrect. Edward contends the notice of appeal was not timely filed. We agree with Edward and dismiss the appeal.

Factual and Procedural Background

The following facts are gleaned from the allegations of the unverified complaint and the declarations filed in support of and opposition to the motion. Edward and his daughter Crisanne Glasser (Crisanne), who was bom on January 11, 1993, reside in Woodbridge, New Jersey. Stephen and Edward are brothers and are the sons of Murray B. Glasser (Murray).

Sometime prior to 1994, Murray used his own funds to establish a Resource Management Account at Paine Webber in the names of Murray B. Glasser & Stephen R. Glasser & Edward H. Glasser as joint tenants with rights of survivorship (the Account). Neither Stephen nor Edward ever deposited any of their own funds in the Account. During his lifetime, Murray was…