Hansell

Hansell v. SANTOS ROBINSON MORTUARY

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 504·64 Cal. App. 4th 608·75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 361·98 Daily Journal DAR 5924·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4332
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 5, 1998A077714California2,847 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dossee, J.

The question presented in this appeal is whether a mortuary who agreed to arrange for cremation of the decedent may be held vicariously liable for the negligent mishandling of the remains by the crematorium. We conclude the duty of care is delegated to the crematorium and the mortuary has no duty to ensure the propriety of the cremation services.

Procedural History

Plaintiffs are family members of decedents whose bodies were cremated by Pleasant Hill Cemetery, Inc. (Pleasant Hill). Upon discovery that Pleasant Hill had routinely engaged in improper practices in performing cremation services, plaintiffs instituted a class action against Pleasant Hill and 15 mortuaries that had utilized the cremation services of Pleasant Hill. In all a total of 7,282 bodies are believed to have been referred by the mortuaries to Pleasant Hill.

A nonjury trial was held solely on the theory of negligence. By stipulation the issues were bifurcated so that the first phase of the trial was confined to a determination of whether the referring mortuaries had a nondelegable duty to plaintiffs and whether the wrongful practices of Pleasant Hill constituted a breach of a duty. Issues of causation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.