Dole Bakersfield, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 548·64 Cal. App. 4th 1273·75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 836·98 Daily Journal DAR 6685·63 Cal. Comp. Cases 698
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 18, 1998F029389California1,291 words

Opinion

Opinion

Acting, J.

Respondent Isaías Arguelles (Arguelles) worked as a general laborer for petitioner Dole Bakersfield, Inc. (Dole), from 1990 until June of 1996. He sustained admitted industrial injuries to his back on May 2b, 1994, and November 18, 1995. At a mandatory settlement conference before a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ), Arguelles’s attorney listed only his client as a witness. Dole listed three witnesses, not including Arguelles. At trial Arguelles’s attorney submitted the case on the record. Dole called Arguelles as a witness. The WCJ sustained Arguelles’s objection, finding Dole was precluded from calling him because he did not appear on Dole's witness list.

Following the findings, award and order, Dole sought reconsideration, contending the WCJ erred in two respects: relying upon the opinion of Dr. Alan Sanders to determine Arguelles’s disability and refusing to allow cross-examination of him. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB), in a two-to-one decision, denied the petition.

Discussion

I

II.

Cross-examination of Arguelles

Labor Code section 5502, subdivision (d)(3) provides: “If the claim is not resolved at the mandatory settlement conference, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.