Hong

People v. Hong

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 533·64 Cal. App. 4th 1071·76 Cal. Rptr. 2d 23·98 Daily Journal DAR 6525·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4603
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 15, 1998B113309California5,359 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

Defendant, James Hong, appeals after he was convicted of multiple offenses: attempted murder (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 664); assault with a deadly weapon as a felony (§ 245, subd. (a)); two counts of felony corporal injury to a spouse or cohabitant; (§ 273.5, subd. (a)); making a terrorist threat (§ 422); two counts of misdemeanor assault (§ 240); misdemeanor vandalism (§ 594, subd. (a)); misdemeanor assault by means of force likely to inflict great bodily injury with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)); and a single count of misdemeanor corporal injury to a spouse. (§ 273.5, subd. (a).) Additionally, three allegations pursuant section 12022.7, subdivision (d) were found to be true.

In the published portion of the opinion, we address the duty of the superior court clerk to include a restitution fine pursuant to section 1202.4, subdivision (b) and other orders in the abstract of judgment. We further address the requirement that a fine also be imposed pursuant to section 1202.45 when the defendant is fined in compliance with section 1202.4.

In the published portion of this opinion we address two issues. The first issue involves the abstract of judgment. The second question…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.