People v. Smith

Good Law
64 Cal. App. 4th 1458
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 1998D026997California4,567 words

Opinion

Opinion

[Opinion certified for partial publication. [*] ]

OPINION

BENKE, Acting P.J.

In this case we conclude the failure to seek a judgment of acquittal at the close of the prosecution's case in chief pursuant to Penal Code [2] section 1118.1 waives argument on appeal that the evidence was insufficient at that point to support conviction.

Victor James Smith was found guilty of two counts of burglary, receiving an access card intending to defraud, acquiring access card information with the intend to defraud, forgery of an access card and attempted grand theft. He was sentenced to a prison term of three years. Smith appeals, arguing insufficient evidence, error in the admission of prior convictions to impeach and in failing to strike the attempted grand theft conviction as a lesser included offense of acquiring an access card and access card information with the intent to defraud.

On May 7, 1995, appellant went to the will-call desk at Home Depot on Sports Arena Boulevard and presented a typewritten list of items he wished to purchase, including the items' stock numbers and prices. The total amount of the purchases was $815.81. Appellant filled out a will-call form, giving his name,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.