Scott

People v. Scott

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 501·64 Cal. App. 4th 550·75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 315·98 Daily Journal DAR 5893·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4343
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 5, 1998B112469California11,946 words

Opinion

Opinion

Klein, J.

Defendant and appellant Wesley E. Scott (Scott) brought a motion to proceed in propria persona on appeal.

In the landmark case of Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806, 818-832 [ 95 S.Ct. 2525, 2532-2539 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 ] (Faretta), the United States Supreme Court ruled that implicit in a criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of counsel at trial is the right to self-representation at trial. The following year, In re Walker (1976) 56 Cal.App.3d 225 , 228-229 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 291 ], held the right to self-representation under Faretta does not extend to a state criminal appeal. Over the past two decades, as discussed below, there has developed a growing split of authority in other jurisdictions as to whether the Sixth Amendment right to self-representation at a criminal trial recognized by Faretta extends to the appeal. Therefore, we deemed it appropriate to examine the continued viability of In re Walker, supra, 56 Cal.App.3d 225 , which is over 20 years old and the sole California case on the issue. Consequently, in response to Scott’s request to proceed in propria persona, this court sent the parties a three-page letter setting forth issues to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.