NORCO DELIVERY SER. v. Owens Corning

Good Law
64 Cal. App. 4th 955·75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 456
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 11, 1998G016225California2,619 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ricks & Anderson, Cecil E. Ricks, Jr., and Annette L. Anderson, Costa Mesa, for Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Porter, Groff & Lodwick, Michael W. Lodwick and Stephen C. Klausen, Long Beach, for Cross-defendant and Respondent.

CROSBY, Associate Justice.

Following a settlement between Owens-Corning Fiberglas and Seaward Properties, Ltd., the plaintiff in the underlying action, the trial court made a good faith determination and barred all cross-complaints against Owens-Corning, including that of Norco Delivery Service, under Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6. Norco challenges that good faith determination and also asserts the court, in addition to erroneously dismissing Norco's indemnity and contribution claims, improperly barred its independent, direct claims against Owens-Corning. We affirm.

Norco leased property in Anaheim from Seaward on which Norco had underground storage tanks to supply fuel for trucks used in its delivery business. One such tank — manufactured by Owens-Corning — was purchased by Norco in used condition in 1976. In the process of installing this tank, codefendant Wayne Perry dropped and damaged it. As a result, before Perry could complete the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.