Ziegler

Ziegler v. Nickel

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 500·64 Cal. App. 4th 545·75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 312·98 Daily Journal DAR 5875·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4285
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 4, 1998B100335California1,192 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

Introduction

Plaintiff, Mighty Oak Trust, appeals from the order of the trial court directing Jimmy Dean Ziegler, trustee, to withdraw as attorney for the trust and engage a licensed attorney to represent the Trust in its lawsuit against defendants Earl and Thelia Nickel. After analyzing a novel issue in California, we hold the trial court’s order was proper.

Factual and Procedural Background

This action was commenced by Ziegler as trustee of the Mighty Oak Trust (Trust) alleging, as sellers of a certain mobilehome to the Trust, defendants had intentionally failed to disclose certain material defects. Defendants demurred to the complaint.

Concurrently, defendants noticed and filed a motion for an order compelling Ziegler to withdraw as attorney for the Trust. The motion was brought on the ground that Ziegler was not an attorney and so his representation of the Trust in the lawsuit constituted an unauthorized practice of law in violation of Business and Professions Code section 6125. Defendants requested the court order that Ziegler may no longer represent the Trust, and direct the Trust to hire a member of the bar to prosecute this lawsuit. Ziegler opposed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.