PAULETTO
PAULETTO v. Reliance Ins. Co.
Opinion
Opinion
O'NEILL, Associate Justice. [*]
Louie Pauletto and Dorothy E. Pauletto filed a complaint for malicious prosecution and abuse of process against Reliance Insurance Company (Reliance), United Pacific Insurance Company (United Pacific) and the law firm of Booth, Mitchell & Strange (collectively defendants). The complaint was based on defendants' institution of proceedings in federal bankruptcy court to contest the dischargeability of a debt the Paulettos owed to Reliance and United Pacific. The Paulettos appeal a judgment entered against them after the court sustained defendants' demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend on the ground their causes of action are preempted by federal bankruptcy law. We affirm.
Because this is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the sustaining of a general demurrer, "we accept as true all the material allegations of the complaint." ( Shoemaker v. Myers (1990) 52 Cal.3d 1, 7 , 276 Cal.Rptr. 303 , 801 P.2d 1054 .) The Paulettos' complaint discloses the following facts.
The Paulettos were the sole owners and shareholders of Louetto Construction Company, Inc. (Louetto), a general contractor in the construction business. From 1982…