Atlas

People v. Atlas

Good Law
64 Cal. App. 4th 523·75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 307
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 3, 1998B113059California3,242 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOTT, Associate Justice.

Donnell Atlas appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction by jury of possessing cocaine base for sale, with the finding that the offense was committed within 1,000 feet of a school. (Health & Saf.Code, §§ 11351.5, 11353.6, subd. (b).) The court found that he had sustained two prior serious felony convictions within the meaning of the Three Strikes law (Pen.Code, §§ 1170.12, subds. (a)—(d), 667, subds. (b)—(i)) and a prior conviction within the meaning of Health and Safety Code section 11370.2, subdivision (a). [1] Appellant contends that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to instruct the jury that the intent to sell narcotics had to occur within 1,000 feet of a school in order for section 11353.6 to apply. We reject this claim, and hold that section 11353.6 does not require proof of such intent.

The evidence established that at approximately 8:40 a.m. on May 7, 1996, two Los Angeles sheriffs deputies driving eastbound on Manchester Boulevard stopped then marked patrol vehicle at a traffic light at Vermont Avenue and saw appellant standing in a nearby north/south alley. Along the alley, within 1,000 feet of where appellant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.