Hong

People v. Hong

Good Law
64 Cal. App. 4th 1071·76 Cal. Rptr. 2d 23
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 15, 1998B113309California5,595 words

Opinion

Opinion

Certified for Partial Publication. [*]

TURNER, Presiding Justice.

Defendant, James Hong, appeals after he was convicted of multiple offenses: attempted murder (Pen.Code, §§ 187, 664 [1] ); assault with a deadly weapon as a felony (§ 245, subd. (a)); two counts of felony corporal injury to a spouse or cohabitant; (§ 273.5, subd. (a)); making a terrorist threat (§ 422); two counts of misdemeanor assault (§ 240); misdemeanor vandalism (§ 594, subd. (a)); misdemeanor assault by means of force likely to inflict great bodily injury with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)); and a single count of misdemeanor corporal injury to a spouse. (§ 273.5, subd. (a).) Additionally, three allegations pursuant section 12022.7, subdivision (d) were found to be true.

In the published portion of the opinion, we address the duty of the superior court clerk to include a restitution fine pursuant to section 1202.4, subdivision (b) and other orders in the abstract of judgment. We further address the requirement that a fine also be imposed pursuant to section 1202.45 when the defendant is fined in compliance with section 1202.4.

[[/]]

In the published portion of this opinion we address two issues. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.