GREEN & SHINEE v. Superior Court

Good Law
105 Cal. Rptr. 2d 886·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 281·2001 Daily Journal DAR 3713·88 Cal. App. 4th 532·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3026
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 16, 2001B138892California1,808 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Here we conclude that reports prepared by police officers in the performance of their duties are not protected by the attorney-client privilege.

The law firm of Green & Shinee attempts to appeal an order by the trial court that releases documents seized from the law film’s offices and sealed by a special master pursuant to Penal Code section 1524, subdivision (c). We treat the purported appeal as a petition for writ of mandate. (People v. Superior Court (Bauman & Rose) (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1757, 1761-1762 [ 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 734 ].) We consider the merits of the petition and deny it.

Facts

During the evening of January 19, 1999, off-duty deputies of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department attended a hockey game. Thereafter, Deputies Gary Gerlach, Ivan Chavez, Guillermo Morales, and Craig Roberts went to Tam’s Restaurant in Lynwood. Inside the restaurant, a patron began to harass and threaten them, stating: “I don’t give a fuck if you[’re] a cop or a fireman. I’ve got two strikes and I’ll kick your white ass.” Earlier, restaurant employees noticed the patron harassing other customers.

The patron suddenly punched Deputies Gerlach and Chavez, causing them minor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.