Davis

Davis v. Newmar Corp.

Good Law
136 Cal. App. 4th 275·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 130·2006 Daily Journal DAR 1425·38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 690·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1044
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 2006B174944California1,038 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ashmann-Gerst, J.

Following a jury verdict in favor of respondent Darin R. Davis (Davis), appellants Newmar Corporation (Newmar) and La Mesa R.V. Center, Inc. (La Mesa), filed the instant appeal, challenging the trial court’s orders denying their pretrial motion to dismiss and their posttrial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court’s decision in Cummins, Inc. v. Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal.4th 478 [ 30 Cal.Rptr.3d 823 , 115 P.3d 98 ] (Cummins) was rendered. Pursuant to Cummins, we reverse the trial court’s order denying the pretrial motion to dismiss. It follows that the judgment against appellants is reversed as well.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2001, Davis negotiated terms for the purchase of a new 2002 Newmar Dutch Star motor home with retailer La Mesa, which is located in California. The sales contract provides that California law applies to the transaction. Consistent with California law, one of the terms of the sale required La Mesa to deliver the motor home to Davis in Nevada.

After delivery, respondent claimed that the motor home suffered defects, and La Mesa made repairs to the motor home.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.