Fisher

People v. Fisher

Good Law
136 Cal. App. 4th 76·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 109·2006 Daily Journal DAR 1216·38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 540·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 899
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 2006B181560California1,678 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Todd Fisher appeals from a jury verdict declaring him to be a mentally disordered offender (MDO) within the meaning of Penal Code section 2960 et seq. As we shall explain, appellant has made some poor choices. All mental health professionals agree that appellant is an MDO. Appellant himself told the jury that he lives in “la la land” and is “crazy.” He also told the jury: “I have a mental disorder.” These candid admissions, his failure to participate in any treatment at Atascadero State Hospital, his waiver of the right to counsel, his insistence on the right to represent himself, and his sorry performance at trial sealed his fate with the jury.

Appellant contends the trial court erred when it required him to wear leg restraints in the courtroom. He also contends he was denied the right to counsel and “forced” to represent himself at trial because the trial court refused to order his court-appointed attorney to try the matter before a jury. We affirm.

Facts and Proceedings

In January 2002, appellant was convicted of forcible oral copulation in violation of section 288a, subdivision (c)(2) and unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, in violation of section 261.5,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.