Burgener

Burgener v. California Adult Authority

Good Law
407 F. Supp. 555·21 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1109·1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16992
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 1976C-74-1631-CBRCalifornia457 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner in state custody at San Quentin State Prison, Tamal, California, filed this civil rights complaint and petition for habeas corpus on August 5, 1974, under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983, and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 , 2202, 2241 and 2254, on his own behalf and, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on behalf of all other persons similarly situated. He seeks declaratory and injunctive relief. Specifically, plaintiff asks the Court to declare, inter alia, (1) that California’s Indeterminate Sentence Law, California Penal Code §§ 1168 and 3020, is unconstitutional on its face as violative of the Speedy Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment, the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment, and the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment; (2) that plaintiff and the members of the purported class have a right to a final fixing of their prison terms within six months of the date of their incarceration; and (3) that all persons incarcerated in California State Prisons for more than six months whose prison terms have not been finally fixed are entitled to be released upon serving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.