Shamsian

Shamsian v. Department of Conservation

Good Law
136 Cal. App. 4th 621·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 163·2006 Daily Journal DAR 1621·39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 62·36 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20034
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 2006B184680California8,456 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Ferial Shamsian, appeals from a judgment dismissing her first amended complaint and denying her mandate petition as to defendants: the Department of Conservation (department); two individuals—Darryl W. Young, department director, and Jim Ferguson, assistant director of the California Beverage Container Recycling Program; and two corporations— Anheuser-Busch, Inc., and Miller Brewing Company (the corporate defendants). Plaintiff alleged the defendants had failed to provide convenient, economical, and efficient beverage container redemption opportunities for California consumers as required by section 14501, subdivision (g) of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, Public Resources Code section 14500 et seq. (the act).

Plaintiff raises two contentions she claims are dispositive of this appeal. To begin with, plaintiff asserts defendants have a mandatory duty pursuant to section 14501, subdivision (g) such that a private right of action challenging their alleged inaction may be pursued by her. The trial court ruled there was no mandatory duty created by section 14501, subdivision (g). Also, plaintiff argues she can…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.