Rodgers

Rodgers v. Sargent Controls & Aerospace

Good Law
136 Cal. App. 4th 82·38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 528
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 2006A110023California4,926 words

Opinion

Opinion

Swager, J.

The trial court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed appellant’s action for personal injuries caused by asbestos exposure. The court determined that appellant is bound by findings in prior superior court cases that respondent cannot be found liable to appellant as a successor entity to Amot Marine Corporation. We conclude that the doctrine of collateral estoppel cannot be applied to appellant, and therefore remand the case to the trial court for determination of the successor liability issue on the merits.

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Appellant filed the present personal injury action against respondent and other named defendants on December 5, 2000. The complaint alleged that during the course of appellant’s employment duties he was exposed to “asbestos and asbestos-containing products,” which caused him to develop asbestosis and other lung damage. Respondent Sargent Controls & Aerospace (respondent or Sargent) was alleged to be liable to appellant as a successor in interest to other corporate entities: Sargent Industries, Inc., Kahr Bearing Corporation (Kahr), Aetna Steel Products Corporation (Aetna), and Amot Marine Corporation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.