Zweig

Zweig v. Hearst Corp.

Good Law
407 F. Supp. 763·1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16613
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 1976Civ. 72-938-AAHCalifornia1,262 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hauk, J.

AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The above entitled action came on regularly for trial before the Court, sitting, without jury, on the 10th and 11th of April, 1975, and on the 20th and 23rd of October, 1975, the Honorable A. Andrew Hauk, Judge Presiding; Philip Michael Brown and Alton I. Leib appearing as counsel for Plaintiffs; Knapp, Stevens, Grossman & Marsh by Wixon Stevens appearing for Defendant Alex N. Campbell; Maurice L. Muehle appearing for Defendants H. W. Jamieson and Edward L. Oesterle; Risley and Lindquist by Eric N. Lindquist appearing for Third-party Defendant Willard Hughes; Jack M. Peters appearing for Third-party Defendant Samuel G. Lampel; and the Court having heard the testimony; having examined the evidence, both oral and documentary, introduced by plaintiffs; and having received the admissions and concessions made by plaintiffs; and having received and considered plaintiffs’ offers of proof and defendant Campbell’s objection thereto and ruled thereon, which procedure was proposed by plaintiffs; and after considering all of the foregoing in a light most favorable to plaintiffs, including the pleadings and pretrial order; and having granted the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.