VASCO

People v. VASCO

Good Law
131 Cal. App. 4th 137·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1114·2005 Daily Journal DAR 8698·31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 643·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6362
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 2005G031916California8,996 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aronson, J.

A jury convicted defendant Adriana Vasco of the first degree murder of Carolyn Stahl and the second degree murder of her husband, Ken Stahl. Multiple-murder and lying-in-wait special-circumstance allegations were found to be true. She contends the court erroneously applied the newsperson’s shield law to restrict her cross-examination of a newspaper reporter who interviewed her in jail. She also contends the evidence is insufficient to support the second degree murder conviction based on a theory it was a natural and probable consequence of the murder she aided and abetted. We affirm.

I

Facts

A. Overview

Ken Stahl, a prominent Huntington Beach osteopathic physician, hired a contract killer to murder his wife Carolyn while the couple celebrated her birthday. Stahl’s murderous betrayal of his wife was matched on a smaller scale when the gunman turned the weapon on Stahl and opened fire, killing him instantly.

Defendant played a key role in this tragic drama. As Stahl’s former mistress and long-time confidante, she was privy to his obsession to murder his wife. She introduced Stahl to her new boyfriend, Tony Satton, when she learned the latter had experience as a hired…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.