Concerned Citizens of La Habra v. City of La Habra

Good Law
131 Cal. App. 4th 329·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1166·2005 Daily Journal DAR 8944·31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 599·35 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20154
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 23, 2005G034014California2,150 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sills, J.

The Concerned Citizens of La Habra (CCLH) filed a petition for writ of mandate challenging the approval by the City of La Habra and others (the City) of the proposed construction of a retail warehouse facility by Costco Wholesale Corporation (the Project). CCLH alleged six causes of action, one of which was the failure to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq., CEQA) in several respects. While five of the causes of action were unsuccessful, the CEQA challenge achieved partial success: The superior court agreed with one of the several alleged CEQA defects, finding that the mitigated negative declaration certified by the City needed revision. It issued a writ rescinding approval of the Project until the revision was made. Subsequently, CCLH moved for attorney fees under the private attorney general statute (Code Civ. Proc., § 1021.5), which were denied. CCLH appeals from the denial of attorney fees, claiming it fulfilled the requirements of the statute and the trial court abused its discretion. We affirm.

FACTS

The City approved the Project without preparing an environmental impact report (EIR); instead, it certified a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.