In Re Tamika C.

Kern County Department of Human Services v. Tamika C.

Good Law
131 Cal. App. 4th 1153·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1233·2005 Daily Journal DAR 9595·32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 597·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7058
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 9, 2005F047571California5,657 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vartabedian, J.

Tamika C. has been a dependent child of the juvenile court placed in long-term foster care almost her entire life. The Kern County Department of Human Services (department) filed a petition seeking to terminate dependency after Tamika reached the age of majority. The department’s basis for termination was to relieve itself of the increased financial obligation that must be borne by the department when a dependent child reaches the age of 19. Tamika, through her counsel, objected to the termination of dependency because she wished to remain a dependent child of the court until she completed her high school education, scheduled for June of 2006. The trial court terminated dependency. Tamika appeals from this order, claiming the trial court erred in terminating her dependency.

We must determine if it would be in Tamika’s best interests to remain a dependent until she graduates from high school, or if the department’s stated desire to save money is sufficient to override Tamika’s best interests. We reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Tamika’s infant brother was abandoned by their mother. The department investigated and determined that Tamika and her three older sisters were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.