ROMAN CATH. ARCHBISHOP OF LA v. Super. Ct.

Good Law
131 Cal. App. 4th 417·32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 209
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 25, 2005B177852, B180696California16,452 words

Opinion

Opinion

Steve Cooley, District Attorney (Los Angeles), and Lael Rubin, William Hodgman, Brentford J. Ferreira and Patrick D. Moran, Deputy District Attorneys, for Real Party in Interest.

This proceeding arises out of a grand jury investigation into allegations that two Roman Catholic priests, petitioners Doe 1 and Doe 2 (sometimes hereafter referred to as the Priests), sexually assaulted children while they worked for petitioner Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles, a Corporation Sole (hereafter referred to as the Archdiocese). In seeking to quash grand jury subpoenas duces tecum, petitioners raise issues that require a balance of the rights of religious belief and practice with the rules of the criminal justice system.

As the California Supreme Court noted in connection with this state's evidentiary privilege for clergy-penitent communications (Evid.Code, §§ 1030-1034), "the statutory privilege must be recognized as basically an explicit accommodation by the secular state to strongly held religious tenets of a large segment of its citizenry." ( In re Lifschutz (1970) 2 Cal.3d 415, 428 , 85 Cal.Rptr. 829 , 467 P.2d 557 .) While it is true the right to religious freedom…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.