Weir

MORAGA-ORINDA FIRE PROTECTION DIST. v. Weir

Good Law
10 Cal. Rptr. 3d 13·115 Cal. App. 4th 477
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 2004A101235California2,119 words

Opinion

Opinion

John A. Ramirez, Costa Mesa, Michael R.W. Houston; Rutan & Tucker, for Amicus Curiae, California League of Cities.

No appearance for Defendants and Respondents.

PARRILLI, J.

This case arises from the trial court's denial of a motion to recover attorney fees and costs under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. [1] We reverse.

Appellants are unincorporated associations of Orinda homeowners. They submitted a rebuttal argument for a voter information pamphlet regarding a proposed tax increase to fund improvements in the water flow to fire hydrants in Orinda. Respondent Moraga-Orinda Fire Protection District filed a mandamus petition seeking to strike or modify certain statements in the rebuttal. Three days later, the District filed an amended petition adding respondent Gene Gottfried, M.D., a Director of the District, as a petitioner. Appellants responded by challenging the District's standing under Elections Code section 13313, [2] and arguing that the amended petition was not timely filed. Appellants also moved to strike the petition as a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) under section 425.16.

The trial court denied the petition, ruling that the District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.