Bernardo

Bernardo v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America

Good Law
115 Cal. App. 4th 322·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 111·2004 Daily Journal DAR 1025·9 Cal. Rptr. 3d 197·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 846
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 2004D040186, D040866California18,053 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nares, J.

Agnes Bernardo, Pamela Colip and Saundra Dufify-Hawkins (collectively, Bernardo) brought suit for injunctive relief against Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) and Planned Parenthood of San Diego and Riverside Counties (PPSDRC) (together Planned Parenthood) under California’s unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) and false advertising law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17500 et seq.). Bernardo alleged that PPFA’s and PPSDRC’s Internet Web sites ( and , respectively) contained “unlawful, unfair, confusing, and misleading statements/advertisements” that caused women to make critical health care decisions without full, complete, and accurate information about (1) the safety of abortion, (2) the safety of abortion vis-a-vis childbirth, and (3) the scientific/medical literature that Bernardo claims establishes a link between induced abortion and breast cancer (hereafter sometimes referred to as the ABC link).

Bernardo sought two types of injunctive relief: (1) an injunction restraining Planned Parenthood from publishing its statements that abortion is safe or safer than childbirth and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.