Fresno County Department of Children & Family Sevices v. Superior Court

Good Law
122 Cal. App. 4th 626·19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 155·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1582·2004 Daily Journal DAR 11769·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8646
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2004F045698California8,632 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vartabedian, J.

In March 2004, respondent Fresno County Superior Court, sitting as a juvenile court, terminated parental rights to half sisters, one-year-old Rhiannon and three-year-old Lily. Rhiannon is an Indian child within the meaning of the Indian Child Welfare Act ( 25 U.S.C. §1901 et seq.; ICWA); she is eligible for membership in the federally recognized Cold Springs Ranchería of the Mono Indians (tribe). Lily, although also of Native American descent, is not an Indian child under ICWA. While termination was undisputed at the March proceedings, the children’s placement was hotly contested. The tribe, joined by Fresno County Department of Children and Family Services (the department) and the children’s mother, petitioned the juvenile court to place the children with an Indian family, selected by the tribe in accordance with ICWA’s placement preference ( 25 U.S.C. § 1915 ) and approved by the department. The children’s attorney objected, claiming there was “good cause” under ICWA not to follow the placement preference. Following an evidentiary hearing, the juvenile court agreed with the children’s attorney and denied the tribe’s petition. The court further ordered that if the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.