Kendrick

People v. Kendrick

Good Law
122 Cal. App. 4th 1303·19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 436
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 2005F044059California1,646 words

Opinion

Opinion

VARTABEDIAN, Acting P.J.

The issue before us on this appeal is whether a defendant may validly enter into a plea bargain that permits sentencing under the determinate sentencing law, when the admitted crime is a "nonviolent drug possession offense" for purposes of Proposition 36. (See Pen.Code, §§ 1210, subd. (a), 1210.1.) We conclude he may, and affirm defendant's sentence imposed pursuant to the plea bargain.

Defendant Frank Kendrick agreed to sell a police informant "3 or 4" ounces of cocaine. The informant met defendant at a Wal-Mart parking lot. Defendant's associate, Delgado, stood watch in front of the store. At the informant's prearranged signal, officers moved in to arrest defendant. They found 3.56 ounces of cocaine under the seat of defendant's car and a much smaller amount in his pocket. As the officers arrested defendant, Delgado turned away and entered a store. Other officers arrested him. A search of Delgado's home recovered 1.59 pounds of cocaine.

An information charged defendant with possession of cocaine for sale (count 1; Health & Saf.Code, § 11351) and transportation of cocaine (count 2; Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a)) not for personal use (Pen.Code,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.