Wright

Wright v. State

Good Law
122 Cal. App. 4th 659·19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 92
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2004C044302California4,147 words

Opinion

Opinion

NICHOLSON, Acting P.J.

Plaintiff Justin Wright appeals from a judgment of dismissal in favor of the State of California, the Department of Corrections and certain administrative and medical personnel in that department (collectively, the State). The trial court granted the State's demurrer to Wright's complaint alleging medical malpractice and failure to furnish medical care. We affirm the judgment.

We conclude, as did the trial court, that Wright cannot maintain this action because he failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies. Wright concedes that he has not completed the administrative process provided by the Department of Corrections (Department). Although money damages are unavailable in the administrative process, Wright must exhaust his administrative remedies before seeking judicial relief. Even where money damages are unavailable, the exhaustion requirement furthers important interests: prison autonomy, mitigating damages, application of Department expertise, and order in the court system. We also conclude the State is immune from suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence.

Wright is a state prison inmate. Beginning August 22,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.