Parks

Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Parks

Good Law
122 Cal. App. 4th 779·19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 17
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 2004B170730California6,161 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Safeco Insurance Company of America (Safeco) appeals from the judgment, after a nonjury trial, declaring that it breached its duty to defend and to indemnify Michelle Miller in a negligence action brought against her by her former boyfriend, Jamey Lynn Parks. Safeco contends it owed no duty to defend Miller because she was not an insured under a homeowners policy it issued to the man with whom her mother was living when Parks was injured, and because the policy excludes coverage for injuries arising out of the use of an automobile. Parks and Miller contend that Miller meets the policy’s definition of an insured and that the automobile exclusion does not apply. We conclude the trial court erred in finding that Safeco had a duty to defend Miller. Safeco reasonably declined the defense because the information then made available to Safeco by its insured and other interested parties disclosed no potential that Miller was an insured under the policy. Accordingly, we reverse. We affirm a previously made discovery sanction order.

Facts

Parks ’s Injuries and Complaint Against Miller

Michelle Miller was 17 years old on the night of February 29, 1999, when she went “clubbing” in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.