Link

Link v. Cater

Bad Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 43·60 Cal. App. 2d 1315·60 Cal. App. 4th 1315·71 Cal. Rptr. 2d 130·98 Daily Journal DAR 673
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 1998B097430California4,230 words

Opinion

Opinion

Spencer, J.

Introduction

Plaintiff Dana Link appeals from an order dismissing this action for failure to appear. The dismissal was in favor of defendants John Cater, Gary Spencer and the County of Los Angeles. We reverse.

Factual and Procedural Background

Plaintiff filed this action for assault and battery, false arrest and false imprisonment, negligent hiring and/or retention, and violation of his civil rights under 42 United States Code section 1983 on July 10, 1990. Defendants answered the complaint on August 31, 1990. Plaintiff filed his at-issue memorandum on June 18, 1991. He requested a jury trial and estimated the time for trial to be five days.

The trial setting conference was held on October 23, 1991. A mandatory settlement conference originally was set for June 22, 1992, and trial set for July 27, 1992. Both were continued a number of times; plaintiff was present in court on some of these occasions. On May 25, 1993, the case was taken off calendar and transferred to Judge Soussan G. Bruguera’s courtroom and a mandatory settlement conference was set for June 7, 1993. On June 7, a mandatory settlement conference was held; trial was set for September 13. On September 13,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.