Casillas

People v. Casillas

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 1094·60 Cal. App. 2d 445·60 Cal. App. 4th 445·70 Cal. Rptr. 2d 290·97 Daily Journal DAR 15468
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 24, 1997F027004California2,858 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dibiaso, J.

When a defendant pleads guilty pursuant to a favorable sentence bargain subject to an express condition subsequent, is he or she entitled to withdraw the plea when the condition subsequent (his nonappearance at sentencing) occurs? For reasons we will explain, the answer is no.

Facts

Luis Manuel Casillas pled no contest to possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)). Germane to this appeal is the following excerpt from the plea proceedings:

“The Court: Louis Manuel Castillas [sic] 68803. Defendant is present with Miss Bukowski and the interpreter. People represented by Mr. Wolf. This is time and place set for preliminary hearing.

“What is the proposed disposition?

“Ms. Bukowski: Mr. Castillas [sz'c] will plead to an [sic] 11377 for ninety days felony probation.

“The Court: Strike the enhancement?

“Ms. Bukowski: Yes.

“The Court: Mr. Castillas [sic], my understanding—

“Ms. Bukowski: Your Honor, I’m sorry, he will also be released OR; and condition of that OR will be that he appear at sentencing on the date stated.

“The Court: All right. If he does not, then ninety day maximum sentence will be three years in prison, is that correct?

“Ms.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.