In Re Marriage of Jones

Good Law
60 Cal. App. 4th 685·70 Cal. Rptr. 2d 542
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 1998F025546California3,697 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thaxter, J.

Rita L. Lundin (Lundin) appeals from a judgment of dissolution and a subsequent order denying her motion to set aside the judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473 and several provisions of the Family Code. She contends she did not receive notice of the trial date and her former husband, Michael W. Jones (Jones), failed to execute and serve the requisite final declaration of disclosure prior to trial (Fam. Code, § 2105 ). 1 The novel issue presented is whether the judgment must be set aside because it was entered in violation of section 2106 which provides, ". . . absent good cause, no judgment shall be entered with respect to the parties' property rights without each party, or the attorney for that party in this matter, having executed and served a copy of the final declaration of disclosure and current income and expense declaration." We will conclude that any procedural error in entering judgment was harmless as Lundin failed to show she was prejudiced by it. Accordingly, we will affirm.

The subsequent dissolution was tempestuous necessitating a number of court proceedings to determine and enforce domestic violence prevention, spousal support, temporary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.