Stamm Theatres, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance

Good Law
113 Cal. Rptr. 2d 300·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 1177·2001 Daily Journal DAR 11677·93 Cal. App. 4th 531·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9386
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 31, 2001A089933, A090372California4,028 words

Opinion

Opinion

Parrilli, J.

The dictionary definitions of “decay” include a general sense of gradual deterioration in strength or soundness, and a more specific sense of rot or organic decomposition, This case presents the question whether a property insurance policy covering collapse of a building due to “hidden decay” applies to the unexpected failure of wooden roof trusses, with no evidence of rot. We conclude that coverage cannot be ruled out merely because the trusses were not rotten. An insurer promising coverage for collapse due to “hidden decay,” without limiting the scope of the term to organic decay, is liable on claims for any collapse caused by a concealed process of gradual loss in the strength of building materials, unless other policy terms limit coverage. Under this policy and the circumstances of this case, the insured could reasonably expect coverage for an imminent collapse caused by the weakening roof trusses, unless the failure was caused by defective materials or construction methods.

Stamm Theatres, Inc., and its co-owners George F. Stamm and Mary Ann Bolaceo (collectively, Stamm) sued Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (Hartford), among other defendants. Hartford had sold…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.