Alcott Rehabilitation Hospital v. Superior Court

Good Law
112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 807·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 826·2001 Daily Journal DAR 11415·93 Cal. App. 4th 94·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9146
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 24, 2001B147818California4,470 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

Introduction

Real party in interest, plaintiff Peggy Smith (plaintiff), was a woman over the age of 70. A stroke left her incompetent. After the stroke, she became an inpatient at petitioner and defendant Alcott Rehabilitation Hospital (Alcott). Approximately 10 months after the stroke, both of plaintiffs legs were amputated as a result of Alcott’s failure to provide her with proper care.

Alcott petitions for a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its order denying a motion for summary adjudication and instead to enter an order granting the summary adjudication motion based on a determination that portions of plaintiffs causes of action are barred by the statute of limitations in Code of Civil Procedure section 340.5.

We issued an order to show cause and set the matter for hearing. Having reviewed the pleadings and record, and having heard oral argument, we deny the relief requested. We conclude that the insanity tolling provision in Code of Civil Procedure section 352 applies to the one-year limitation period in Code of Civil Procedure section 340.5.

Factual and Procedural Background

1. Facts.

a. First admission (November 18, 1998, to January 12,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.