Raviart

People v. Raviart

Caution
112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 850·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 844·2001 Daily Journal DAR 11531·93 Cal. App. 4th 258·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9237
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 26, 2001C034739California4,934 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nicholson, J.

Defendant Danny George Raviart was convicted by a jury of two counts of robbery, one count of being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm, one count of possession of methamphetamine, and two counts of assault with a firearm on a peace officer. On appeal, defendant contends there was insufficient evidence to support one of his assault convictions and the jury was improperly instructed on the elements of assault. He also contends the trial court committed misconduct by intervening in the examination of witnesses. We affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

In late February 1999, defendant became a suspect in a series of robberies, some of them armed, that had occurred in the Sacramento area between January 26 and February 19. On February 24, 1999, law enforcement officers learned defendant was at a motel on Jibboom Street. Among the officers who went there that evening to arrest defendant were Sacramento Police Officers John Keller and Joe Wagstaff. In a confrontation with defendant outside the -motel, Officers Keller and Wagstaff shot defendant several times after he pointed a handgun at Officer Keller.

Defendant was charged in an amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.