Mathers

People v. Mathers

Good Law
108 Cal. Rptr. 3d 720·183 Cal. App. 4th 1464·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 546
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 2010C060425California1,367 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nicholson, J.

A jury convicted defendant Robert Jay Mathers of possession of a forged completed check (Pen. Code, § 475, subd. (c)—count l), possession, passing, or attempting to pass a fictitious check (§ 476—count 2), second degree burglary (§ 459—count 3), writing a check with insufficient funds (§ 476a, subd. (a)—count 4), and resisting a peace officer (§ 148, subd. (a)(1)—count 5). In a trial by court, defendant was found to have a prior strike conviction and to have served a prior prison term.

Sentenced to state prison for nine years four months, defendant appeals, contending (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the fictitious check conviction (count 2); (2) the court’s instruction on prior uncharged conduct was prejudicial error; (3) the convictions for counts 1, 2, 3, and 4 must be reversed because the court failed to give a unanimity instruction; (4) cumulative instructional error resulted in prejudice; (5) the consecutive sentence imposed on count 2 should have been stayed pursuant to section 654; and (6) the consecutive sentence imposed for count 2 must be reversed because the facts relied upon by the court were not submitted to a jury and found true beyond a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.