City of Cerritos v. CERRITOS TAXPAYERS ASSN.

Good Law
108 Cal. Rptr. 3d 386·183 Cal. App. 4th 1417·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 543
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 20, 2010B214530California11,393 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lichtman, J.

SUMMARY

The principal questions in this case are two. The first is whether a city and a redevelopment agency may use funds earmarked for low- and moderate-income housing to purchase and renovate property which would then be leased to a school district, as part of an arrangement in which the district would in turn lease other property (currently housing its administrative offices) to the redevelopment agency (and ultimately to a nonprofit housing corporation) for the construction of a low- and moderate-income apartment complex for senior citizens. The second question is whether the project, in which 16 percent of the apartments are designated for low-income households, must be submitted to a vote of the electorate under article XXXIV of the California Constitution, which requires voter approval for a “low rent housing project” developed, constructed or acquired by any state public body.

In a validation action brought under Code of Civil Procedure section 860 and Government Code section 53511, the trial court entered a judgment determining that the arrangements were valid and lawful in all respects and were not required to be submitted to a vote of the electorate. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.