FULLERTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. Southern California Gas Co.

Good Law
107 Cal. Rptr. 3d 396·183 Cal. App. 4th 428·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 437
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 30, 2010G041781California2,538 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fybel, J.

Introduction

The Fullerton Redevelopment Agency and the City of Fullerton (collectively, Fullerton) sued Southern California Gas Company (SoCal Gas); Fullerton claimed damage to property it owned was caused by hazardous waste contamination. SoCal Gas cross-complained against Fullerton and Union Pacific Railroad Company (Union Pacific) for contribution and indemnity. A department of the State of California issued a remedial action order requiring Fullerton, Union Pacific, SoCal Gas, and others to clean up the same property.

Fullerton and SoCal Gas entered into a settlement agreement, and the trial court determined that the agreement was a good faith settlement, which would bar any claims for contribution and indemnity against Fullerton by any joint tortfeasors. Union Pacific appeals, arguing the good faith settlement order could not bar claims it might bring against Fullerton under Health and Safety Code section 25363, a provision of the Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act (Health & Saf. Code, § 25300 et seq.; HSAA), which permits contribution and indemnity claims by parties who incur costs to comply with remedial cleanup orders.

We hold that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.