Hopp

Hopp v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
108 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1·183 Cal. App. 4th 713·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 473·2010 WL 779879
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 9, 2010B215265California2,658 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boren, J.

A municipal ordinance requires a police permit for persons in “the business of buying, selling, exchanging or otherwise dealing in secondhand books.” A hobbyist who collects secondhand books for his personal use—and not for resale—has brought a lawsuit for declaratory relief, challenging the municipality’s claim that he must obtain a police permit for his collecting activities. The trial court granted the municipality’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, finding that the hobbyist is a “secondhand book dealer” within the meaning of the ordinance.

After conducting an independent review, we conclude that the complaint states a cause of action for declaratory relief. The ordinance is directed at persons who engage in a commercial activity—both buying and selling— with a view to profit. Someone who simply collects books for personal enjoyment is not a “secondhand book dealer.” Accordingly, we reverse the judgment in favor of the municipality.

FACTS

Richard Hopp resides in the City of Los Angeles (the City). As a hobby, Hopp collects “books, documents, and ephemera.” Hopp purchases the books, documents and ephemera for his personal use: they are not resold, though he “may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.