JH

J.H. v. Los Angeles Unified School District

Bad Law
107 Cal. Rptr. 3d 182·183 Cal. App. 4th 123·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 391·2010 WL 1078380
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 2010B211052California10,560 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

Plaintiff and appellant J.H., a minor child (plaintiff), by and through her mother and guardian ad litem, Kami Shade Agbeti (Mother), appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the Los Angeles Unified School District (the school district), and three of its employees. The judgment was entered after the trial court granted summary adjudication against plaintiff on three of the four causes of action she alleged against the school district and the employees and plaintiff dismissed the remaining cause of action against them. Plaintiff also dismissed all of the causes of action she asserted against the other defendants in the case.

The case concerns physical and sexual assault and battery that plaintiff sustained at one of the school district’s grade school campuses during a voluntary after-school program. The persons inflicting the harm on plaintiff were also students who attended the program. The trial court mled that whereas school districts have an affirmative duty of care to students because of the compulsory nature of education, generally there is no duty of care with respect to children who participate in voluntary after-school programs.

However, our review of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.