Forshay

People v. Forshay

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1041·39 Cal. App. 4th 686·46 Cal. Rptr. 2d 116·95 Daily Journal DAR 14379·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8344
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 1995Docket Nos. A066779, A066780California1,102 words

Opinion

Opinion

Corrigan, J.

Herein, we hold defendant cannot object for the first time on appeal to the imposition of a restitution fine on the ground of an inability to pay. Defendant appeals from separate judgments following (1) his plea of guilty to second degree murder and his admission of the use of a deadly weapon and the intentional infliction of great bodily injury, and (2) the revocation of his probation as a result of that plea. He alleges error only in the court’s order of restitution and a restitution fine. We, in large part, affirm the judgments, remanding solely for the determination of the amount of actual restitution and possible recalculation of the fine.

Statement of Relevant Facts

The narrow focus of defendant’s appeal makes extensive discussion of the underlying facts unnecessary. The facts relating to defendant’s challenge are as follows. Defendant was on probation for felony auto theft and misdemeanor driving under the influence when he was charged with murder, the special circumstance of lying in wait, use of a deadly weapon, and intentional infliction of great bodily injury. By agreement, defendant pled guilty to reduced charges, and the court revoked his probation on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.