In Re Joshua J.

Good Law
39 Cal. App. 4th 984·46 Cal. Rptr. 2d 491
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 1995D022589California4,534 words

Opinion

Opinion

Steven A. Schutte and Alice C. Shotton, under appointments by the Court of Appeal, for Objectors and Appellants.

Lloyd M. Harmon, County Counsel, Susan Strom, Chief Deputy County Counsel, and Kathryn E. Krug, Deputy County Counsel for Plaintiff and Respondent.

[Opinion certified for partial publication. [*] ]

OPINION

HALLER, J.

James J. and Delores D. appeal a judgment under Welfare and Institutions Code [1] section 300, subdivision (j), declaring their son, Joshua J., a dependent of the San Diego County Juvenile Court and removing him from their custody.

James contends the trial court erred by (1) not allowing him to relitigate the basis of a prior dependency proceeding regarding Joshua's half-sibling, and (2) admitting into evidence a psychological evaluation of James performed in connection with the prior dependency proceeding. James also contends there was insufficient evidence that reasonable efforts were made to eliminate the need to remove Joshua from the home.

Delores, who had no involvement with the prior dependency proceeding, contends (1) there was insufficient evidence that Joshua was a dependent child, (2) there were no justifiable grounds for removing Joshua…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.