Warn

Warn v. M/Y MARIDOME

Good Law
961 F. Supp. 1357·97 Daily Journal DAR 7551·1997 WL 154780·1997 A.M.C. 1890·1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4187
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 1997CIV. 96-1800-B(RBB)California11,487 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brewster, J.

ORDER:

1.DENYING DEFENDANT BOOS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION;

2. GRANTING DEFENDANT MARI-DOME MARINE LTD.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION;

3. GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION;

4. DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED AS MOOT;

5.GRANTING DEFENDANTS’MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS.

This matter came on regularly for hearing on defendants’ motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and for forum non conveniens. Matthew Quint of Wilson & Quint, and Frank Brucculeri of Tabrisky, Brucculeri & Stein appeared for plaintiffs. George Koelzer, Robert Zapf, and Joshua Force of Lane Powell Spears Lubersky LLP appeared for defendants James Boos and Maridóme Marine Ltd. Justs Karlson and S. Mark Varney of Carroll, Burdick & McDon-ough LLP appeared for defendant Boston Whaler Co. After careful consideration of the moving and opposing papers and the oral arguments of counsel, the Court DENIES Boos’s motion to dismiss for lack…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.